<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 5370 - Fairy with Deer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.klickypedia.com/sets/5370-fee-mit-zauber-reh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.klickypedia.com/sets/5370-fee-mit-zauber-reh/</link>
	<description>The definitive Playmobil pedia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Shipwreck_light		</title>
		<link>https://www.klickypedia.com/sets/5370-fee-mit-zauber-reh/#comment-213</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shipwreck_light]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 04:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klickypedia.com/sets/5370-fee-mit-zauber-reh/#comment-213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This could have been a lot cooler than it was.  It&#039;s still fun, but there are a lot of missed opportunities.  No garland for the hart? No charms for the fairy? Not even a blade of grass for setting? The fairy herself is pretty amazing even with the fact I&#039;m against the wing slots being built into the figures themselves.  You might as well grab the box, but you&#039;d be better off with 3898 if you want something really interesting with set pieces.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could have been a lot cooler than it was.  It&#8217;s still fun, but there are a lot of missed opportunities.  No garland for the hart? No charms for the fairy? Not even a blade of grass for setting? The fairy herself is pretty amazing even with the fact I&#8217;m against the wing slots being built into the figures themselves.  You might as well grab the box, but you&#8217;d be better off with 3898 if you want something really interesting with set pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
